Are rehabilitation outcomes after severe anoxic brain injury different from severe traumatic brain injury? A matched case-control study.

Many reports have investigated rehabilitation outcomes after a traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, comparably less is known about whether they differ from outcomes of an anoxic brain injury (ABI). Thus, we aimed to compare the rehabilitation outcomes of patients with ABI with control patients who have TBI. Forty participants with ABI and 40 participants with TBI were included in this retrospective study. Participants with ABI were matched with participants with TBI who had similar clinical characteristics such as age, initial Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) score, and duration of coma. FIM and Functional Ambulation Classification (FAC) scores on rehabilitation admission and on rehabilitation discharge were recorded. The FIM score in the ABI group was 41.7±28.5 on rehabilitation admission and increased to 57.1±31.4 on rehabilitation discharge. The FIM score in the TBI group was 40.8±24.0 on rehabilitation admission and increased to 65.9±35.3 on rehabilitation discharge. There was no statistically significant difference in the FIM scores on rehabilitation discharge between groups. Initial FAC was similar in both groups and there was no statistically significant difference in the FAC scores on rehabilitation discharge. The multiple linear regression analysis showed that intensive care unit length of stay had an inverse relationship with the FAC change. We did not find significant differences in the rehabilitation outcomes of participants with ABI compared with participants with TBI. Considering the lack of information in the literature on ABI rehabilitation, this study may be important to guide rehabilitation teams.

Assessment of forearm muscle spasticity with sonoelastography in patients with stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of sonoelastography to show muscle stiffness in post-stroke spasticity, and the relationship between sonoelastography findings and clinical spasticity scores in the spastic forearm muscles. METHODS: This study was carried out in a university rehabilitation centre. 23 patients with stroke with forearm muscle spasticity (≥1+ using the Modified Ashworth scale score and ≥1 using the Tardieu scale) were included. Sonoelastography parameters (elasticity index and elasticity ratio) were measured from the flexor digitorum superficialis, flexor digitorum profundus, flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris muscles on the affected and unaffected sides. RESULTS: Both elasticity index and elasticity ratio of the wrist and finger flexors on the hemiplegic side were significantly increased compared with those on the healthy side (p < 0.05). The Tardieu angle of finger flexors was negatively correlated with the elasticity index and elasticity ratio measured in the spastic flexor digitorum profundus (r = -0.418 and r = -0.469, respectively). Tardieu angle of finger flexors was negatively correlated with the elasticity index measured in the spastic flexor digitorum superficialis (r = -0.435). There was no correlation between other parameters. CONCLUSION: Sonoelastography may provide objective assessment of spasticity both in diagnosis and follow-up. To strengthen this prediction, further studies are necessary. Advances in knowledge: The results of this study represent that sonoelastography is a promising evaluation method for forearm muscle spasticity.

Accuracy of ultrasound-guided suprascapular nerve block measured with neurostimulation.

Although the use of ultrasound (US) to perform suprascapular nerve block (SsNB) is rapidly gaining popularity, information about its accuracy is still lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the proximity of the needle to suprascapular nerve under US guidance by means of neurostimulation current intensity in SsNB. The patients who were referred for SSnB due to shoulder pain were included in the study. The patients were placed in sitting position, and when the operator decided that the needle was in the correct place under US guidance, the time duration until that time and the current amplitude in that location were recorded. Current intensity was obtained by gradually increasing the amplitude until patient feels parestesia over the shoulder area or contractions of the supraspinatus or infraspinatus muscles. Out of 27 patients, in five patients current intensity was between 0.1 and 0.8 mA (successful) and time duration was 2.52 ± 1.67 min in this group; in 19 patients, current intensity was between 0.9 and 1.4 mA (semi-successful) and time duration was 1.86 ± 1.02 min in this group; in three patients, current intensity was ≥ 1.5 mA (unsuccessful) and time duration was 2.41 ± 1.02 min in this group. Our results show that the needle could not reach sufficient proximity to the suprascapular nerve with only US guidance by means of NS current intensity.

Consistency between physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and a radiologist in interpretation of lumbosacral radiographs.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate intra- and inter-observer reliability among physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and a radiologist in interpretation of plain lumbar spine X-ray films in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Three assessors (A: a resident of PM&R, B: an experienced PM&R specialist, C: an experienced radiologist) read the standard lumbosacral plain radiographs of 79 patients with 2-3 month time interval. Each assessor recorded the presence or absence of abnormalities on the radiograph according to a standardized assessment form. RESULTS: For assessors B and C, all kappa values were > 0.40. Transitional vertebrae abnormalities reached to the highest agreement ratio. The intrarater agreement showed higher kappas than the interrater agreement. The radiologists had the highest intrarater agreement, closely followed by the experienced PM&R specialist. Agreement among three assessors was substantial in sacralisation, lumbarisation and facet joint pathologies. CONCLUSION: We usually obtained a good intrarater agreement, especially for the experienced PM&R specialist and the radiologist indicating that experience increases diagnostic consistency. Besides the systematic differences in radiographic interpretation between the assessors, institutional specific conditions (esp. patient profile and regularities) may cause the phycians to pay more attention to a specific group of pathologies.